|
SaveOurNatureCoast.com
Dedicated to Preservation
of the "Nature Coast"
|
|
Home
Page/News/Meetings Memberships
& Donations Published
Opinion
Elected Officials & Contacts
The "Nature Coast"
The Mine
The River
|
|
Published
Opinion
Page |
Scientists: Pollution
of area groundwater from mines a valid concern
By CHARLIE WHITEHEAD
Naples
Daily News
Originally published 05:42 p.m., May 15, 2008
Updated 05:42 p.m., May 15, 2008
The
ground in southeast Lee
County is porous enough to worry about mine lakes contaminating
wellfields, scientists say.
That’s what they thought in Dade
County , too, before studies by the United States Geological Survey
showed groundwater moving through aquifers much faster than thought,
leaving them vulnerable to pollution.
Instead of about 15 feet a day, the scientists found carcinogenic
pathogens could travel as far as 1,200 feet.
That information got a federal judge to order 6,000 acres in Dade
County ’s Lake Belt area closed to mining, a move that heightened
already heavy pressure for mining here. There are only four areas in the
state where construction-quality limerock can be mined, which includes
Lake Belt and southeast Lee.
The situation is different here, USGS local office director Robert Renken
told a county land use group Wednesday, in part because the issue in
Miami-Dade had been studied for years.
The first thing USGS scientists will do here is test the veracity of the
county and other groundwater models, Renken said. That means drilling test
wells and using the latest technology to track actual groundwater
movement.
Renken stressed the USGS produces unbiased pure science.
“We are not consultants,” he said.
Tom Missimer is. He’s also a former instructor of Renken’s and the guy
who headed the first USGS effort at mapping local aquifers in 1973. He
said that work has been updated over the years and needs to be a starting
point.
Missimer said a full 78 percent of American drinking water comes from
surface waters, not aquifers, and some communities like Marco
Island get their water from old mine lakes.
Estero resident Peggy Schmitt said she’s worried the USGS will succumb
to pressure from miners and those thirsty for limerock.
“There’s a tremendous amount of pressure for rock mining, and I think
that pressure reverberates at the USGS,” she said. “I think there is a
very strong mental model that supports mining.”
Renken said that’s interesting, given Missimer recently emailed him,
saying the opposite is true.
The Lake Belt issue in Dade County was politically-charged, Renken said,
but when he works under a county contract, like he did there and like he
will here, he lets the county handle the questions.
“The strength of USGS in general is a record of unbiased science,” he
said.
Scott McCaleb, a Florida Rock executive, said he wants to share raw data
as USGS scientists gather it.
“I think it’s good to share as you progress along so stakeholders can
make their own interpretation,” he said.
The county continues to move toward land use changes in the 80,000-acre
portion of southeast Lee where mining is allowed. A moratorium on mine
applications ends in September, and the county committee on which Schmitt
and McCaleb sit is working on recommendations for commissioners.
The USGS study is longer-term. It’s meant to help update the county
Wellfield Protection Ordinance, an update that could further restrict uses
like mining.
©
Naples News |
|
from Ocala.com Monday Mar.
24, 2008
Published Mar. 17, 2008
Their Mine must have our
input
A battle is brewing in
neighboring Levy County. Some Inglis residents are gearing up to fight a
proposal by Tarmac America, a leading concrete maker, to operate a
limerock mine spanning
some 4,000 acres, a quarter of which are wetlands.
The company, the Gainesville
Sun reports, argues the mine would bring jobs, enhance the tax
base and would not harm the water supply. Many in the community dispute
that, saying the
environmental risk from pumping 22 million gallons of water a day - almost
all of which, the
company maintains, would be pumped back into the ground - is too great and
that the invasion
of truck traffic, an estimated 1,000 dump trucks per work day, would ruin
their town.
Beyond the pending joust
between a small town and a giant company, the critical action
regarding this project is happening far from Inglis. In Tallahassee state
Sen. Mike Bennett, a
Bradenton Republican, has introduced a measure to strangle opposition like
that building in
Inglis in the cradle.
Bennett's bill (SB 2406) would
block local governments from adopting or enforcing regulations
to prohibit or prevent the construction or operation of limerock mines on
property approved for
mining. The bill, citing "the state's critical infrastructure needs
and the potential shortfall" in
construction materials, would allow mining companies to seek fast-track
approval from state
environmental regulators.
In other words, Bennett thinks
the cost of road projects is too high and wants to bulldoze over
those pesky local government officials so the roadbuilders can access this
material more
quickly, and theoretically more cheaply.
The reason for Bennett's bill
was undermined by Cragin Mosteller, spokeswoman for the
Florida Association of Counties, who told the Sun the demand for mining
materials has
dropped 40 percent over the past year. Yet that's not what is most
important.
Here in Marion County, we have
watched residents fight, largely unsuccessfully, similar mining
operations. Along the way, though, the operators of such mines had to
appear before the
County Commission and the public to explain the need for their mine, the
details of its
operation and its impact on the environment. That local input was vital,
even if it was not
always heeded.
But look at this through
another lens. Suppose for limerock we substituted the word
"water."
The County Commission has asserted its right to approve with a special-use
permit water
mining projects that draw more than 100,000 gallons a day, a power the
state Supreme Court
has agreed they can exercise. Were it not for such local oversight, our
community's landscape
would likely be littered with water bottling outfits, given the water
management districts'
proclivity for green-lighting such plans.
Mining is not inherently bad.
But it requires public oversight. Thus, we call on lawmakers to
see Bennett's bill for what it is - an attempt to cater to big business by
stripping local
communities of their voice and the power to contest plans with potentially
adverse effects -
and reject it accordingly. |
|
Gainsville
Sun: Re: TARMAC
Author: inky
Date: 03-08-08 19:58
As Levy County officials prepare to decide whether to permit a massive
mine, a state lawmaker is trying to strip them of that power.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has scheduled two meetings on a
4,000-acre mine proposed in southern Levy County.
The first meeting will be held March 26 at 6 p.m. in the Inglis Community
Center, 137 Highway 40 West, Inglis, FL 34449, (352) 447-2203. To
pre-register for the meeting, visit http://
www.kingroadeis.com/meeting1.htm
The second meeting will be held March 27 at 6 p.m. in the Tommy Usher
Community Center, 506 Southwest 4th Avenue, Chiefland, FL 32626, (352)
493-6711. To pre-register for the meeting, click http://www.kingroadeis.com/meeting2.htm
Tarmac America is proposing a limestone mine on timber land about five
miles north of Inglis. About 4,000 acres would be used for the mining
operation, impacting about 1,150 acres of wetlands, according to the
Deerfield Beach-based company's permit application with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
Company officials say the mine would boost the local economy and provide
material needed to build roads in the region. But some environmental
advocates and local officials say the mine would crowd roads and cause
pollution and saltwater intrusion in groundwater.
"In 15 years, no one will be able to live here anymore," said
Inglis town commissioner Betty Berger. "We won't have any
water."
The mine is in the midst of a lengthy federal, state and water district
permitting process. Even greater scrutiny might be required if the state
decides the project is a development of regional impact. Meantime, the
Levy County planning commission is preparing to consider a special-use
permit in the coming months.
If state Sen. Mike Bennett gets his mining bill passed, however, Levy and
other counties will lose local control of mining. Bennett, R-Bradenton,
introduced a bill last month that would prevent local governments from
taking almost any action to stop the construction or operation of a
limestone mine.
He said the bill would ensure that local political concerns don't prevent
an owner of land designated for mining from using the property. The
measure is needed because the rising cost of the crushed road-building
material called aggregate means higher costs for road projects, Bennett
said.
"We need that aggregate," he said. "It doesn't make sense
that the cost of road building should go up two or three times."
The need for such a measure is lessened by the fact the demand for mining
material has dropped about 40 percent as growth has slowed in the past
year, said Cragin Mosteller, spokeswoman for the Florida Association of
Counties.
An analysis by the association found the bill would strip local
governments from making decisions on any land zoned to allow mining or
even classified by a property appraiser as mining land. The group opposes
the one-size-fits-all nature of the measure, Mosteller said.
"We feel like local government provides an added layer of
environmental protection to their communities," she said.
Al Townsend, manager of the project for Tarmac, said he hadn't read the
bill and couldn't comment on it. He said the mine would benefit Levy
County and disputed any suggestion of adverse impact on groundwater.
|
Letter to Levy County Planning Commission from Joyce Valentino, Chairwoman
Citrus County Board of Commissioners February 25, 2008
Levy County Planning Commission
c/o Levy County Development Department
P.O. Box 672
Bronson, Florida 32621
Re:
Special Exception 9-07
Tarmac America, LLC
Dear Planning Commission members:
It is my understanding
that the above referenced application has been brought before you for
consideration of approval of a special exception to allow limestone mining
on 4,796.4 acres of a 9,377.7 acre tract of land in southern Levy County.
As the elected officials of Citrus County, your neighbor to the south, I
have been asked at the direction of our Board to express concern over
approval of this application.
Both Levy and Citrus
Counties derive their drinking water from the Floridan aquifer, a resource
of groundwater that is vulnerable to both pollution and depletion.
Further, both our Counties have the unique environmental phenomenon of
numerous first magnitude springs for which their very survival is
dependent upon stewardship of the springsheds that feed them. The
authorization for a mine of this size and impact must be carefully
considered within the context of long-term water quantity and quality
impacts.
In addition, the dictates
of growth management require that the applicant’s project be deemed
concurrent on every manner of supporting infrastructure, including both
the local and regional road network.
The projected impacts of
the projected truck traffic will clearly impact on both Levy and Citrus
County‘s roads. We applaud you for transmitting this project to DCA for
evaluation under DRI provisions. Regardless of their final determination,
the full deliberation of their impact is imperative to ensure that our
respective Counties are not faced with capacity and maintenance costs that
would be borne by anyone other than the applicant.
The responsibility you
have taken as a Planning Commission member is a credit to your commitment
to your County and its residents. The Citrus County Commission encourages
you to carefully deliberate and evaluate the application before you and to
not render a decision until you are fully satisfied that you have all the
facts necessary to reach a decision. The impacts of this mine, if
approved, will affect generations of Levy County residents not yet born.
Based on the information,
the applicant has provided to date, we believe approval of this project is
not in the best interest of your residents or ours.
Sincerely,
Joyce Valentino, Chairwoman
Citrus County Board of Commissioners
JV/ma
cc: Levy
County Board of Commissioners
Robert
Corbitt, Levy County Development Department Director;
Michael
Moehlmann, WRPC Director
Thomas
Pelham, DCA Director
|
|
From the Citrus County
Chronicle:
Editorial: Friday February 15, 2008
THE ISSUE: Tarmac King Road rock mine
By Chronicle
Levy mine not good news for west Citrus
The prospect for a big, new Tarmac America King Road rock mine in Levy
County is not good news for the west side of Citrus
County — which will be experiencing about three dozen rock
trucks an hour on U.S. 19 — nor the region.
Anyone who says the mine won’t have a significant impact on the
highway obviously hasn’t driven much on U.S. 19 or had experience
with rock trucks in mining areas. The mine also will penetrate up to
100 feet into the aquifer, and that raises a whole barrage of environmental
questions.
Unfortunately, the trucks that will haul the rock will be
subcontractors, not Tarmac trucks. While Tarmac says the trucks will
be covered and cleaned, the independent owners are not under direct
control of the company. Anyone who has dodged rock trucks, for
example, in Hernando
County, with the rocks and grit bouncing and blowing out of
them on the highway, knows what that means. These loaded trucks
don’t stop on a dime and their loaded density is huge.
Of course, there are concerned operators, but as in any group there
are others who are not so concerned. They get paid by the load and
the number of trips, and so they don’t waste space or time. The
impact in our county will be significant and unavoidable if the mine
goes on as planned.
Granted, there is a need for aggregate rock in Florida
for construction. That is not disputed. We are a growth state. But
the need can’t be fulfilled in any place the mining companies
want, at the expense of anyone’s quality of life, or at any
environmental cost.
The industry just lost mines in northwest Dade County because a
federal judge said they endangered the area’s drinking water
supply. So now we allow them in the richest potable water aquifer in
the state in an environmentally sensitive area near the coast? For
one thing, who’s to guarantee there will not be salt water
intrusion or at the least pollution of the aquifer?
We can bet Yankeetown and Inglis are taking note of this project,
which is only a couple of miles north of them.
So, no matter that the Levy
County planning staff recommended approval, this is not a
good idea as proposed. The project is in the 100-year flood zones
and is about 9,377 acres, of which 4,769 would be mined during a
100-year period. It will use at least 1 million gallons a day and we
already have a nuclear power plant planned for that area that will
require fresh water.
As for “mitigation,” we don’t buy that. A gigantic, deep hole
will be cut into the aquifer in this pristine area leaving a lasting
impact. Once done, that can’t be reclaimed. No alleged mitigation
or donation of land to a preserve can make up for that
The Levy County Planning Council has referred the project to the
Department of Community Affairs for determination of its status as a
Development of Regional Impact, which is good for us, because
regional impact is what it will most certainly have.
A concerned Citrus County Commission asked staff to monitor the
situation, and it has put together a draft letter to the Levy County
Planning Commission noting that Citrus has real concerns, that it
wants to work cooperatively with Levy on regional impact and
planning, and that approval of the project would not be in the best
interests of residents of either county.
We can only hope DCA and the Levy officials agree with that.
|
|
|